Remember, too, that your stance is to be objective and critical, not impressionistic and merely nasty. Your tone will be very important in making your review reliable and intelligent. Before You Attend the Production Read the play before going to the production. It is important to be prepared for the production you plan to attend; otherwise, you run the risk of having to see it several times. Pick out, as you read, several critical or problematic points within the play that may be of particular interest to watch for in the production you are about to attend.
If your instructor has asked you to pay particular attention to certain elements, make sure that you are prepared to recognize them in performance. Attending the Production Attend the play with an open mind, a willingness to accept the play as the director has presented it in production.
You may want to consider some of the following: Why the choice of costumes, and why the set design? How did the actors deliver their lines seriously, comically, realistically, formally? Were any significant cuts made in the script? After the performance, jot down the details you recall and talk about the performance with friends. Evaluate the performance. Did the director miss any important opportunities to convey something you were able to see in your reading of the play?
Would you have liked to have seen more attention paid to what you perceived as critical passages, passages the director seemed less interested in? Why would you have preferred this attention, and why do you think the director avoided giving the passage such attention? Consider the following practical aspects: What kind of stage does the director have at his disposal?
What kinds of restrictions does the stage impose on the director concerning movement and set design? Are the actors professionals, amateurs, or students?
What restrictions does this impose on the director? The name of the director, the place and date of the production you attended, and the name of the production company again, do you know of any previous work by this company? It should express an opinion supported by thoughtful analysis. But its application certainly seems to be in order. Is the reviewer able to discern the vision of the production and the execution of that vision?
Does the reviewer support their views with examples? Do they offer evidence to support their opinions? Does the reviewer let their personal opinion of a play colour their review? Does the reviewer acknowledge the audience reaction particularly if it differs from their own reaction? How do I write a good review? Like all things, it takes practice. Go see a show, and write down your thoughts.
What is your experience? How do the reviews compare and contrast? Did it help you understand the character? Special effects — Were there major scene changers? Audience participation with the actors? Your personal opinion — Discuss one or more areas of technical theatre in the production. If you disliked something how would you change it? If you loved it what made you like it.
The only paragraph it will be allowed is in Paragraph 6. You must validate each of your thoughts. You need to give specific examples for each thing you state in the paper. At no time you can discuss the acting of the production. All your answers must be supported with examples from the production.
A play review can be written in the following formats: an article, an essay, and an extensive summary. Our guide on how to write a music review also will be helpful. But its application certainly seems to be in order. Step 5. What does each review tell you about the reviewer? It will be better to start writing the first draft on the next day of the performance.
The assignment will test your skill as a reader of the play and as an observer and critic of the production. How do I write a good review? Read your assignment carefully to find out which aspects of the performance are to be emphasized in your review. Right after the play, look through your notes to make everything clear.
You have to be able to provide a very brief summary of the play, a close objective analysis of the performance you attend, and an interpretation and evaluation of the entire ensemble of staging, acting, directing, and so on. Does the reviewer let their personal opinion of a play colour their review? The character of Zerlina was not only the most entertaining, setting aside Don John himself, but the only character who brought across a certain energy to the dullest of scenes you would rather not watch.
When you finish answering the questions, you will have a good base for your first draft.
Here is a general outline for the play review: Basic description of the work. However the performance of drib-drab Anna was pronounced bland and mundane the moment any of the other characters opened their mouths.
Who is the author of the play? The best moment for Don John was the one involving him and Zerlina as the relationship based purely on heat was conveyed though eye contact and physical movement. A shock of strobe lighting creates the illusion of bullet shots which effectively makes us squirm and jump up in horror and bright lights to accompany the scene with Don John taking pills and getting high. Focus on particular scenes or performances that will provide the evidence for your final evaluation of the play. Audience participation with the actors?
Example: The tempest scene in Lear utilized a particularly hostile set in order to universalize the suffering depicted throughout the play. Why were certain colors chosen for the decorations? Step 4. Also, the list will save your time and help you gain a fresh perspective on writing a play review. What is the name of the theater? It lead to some pretty odd paragraphs.
Is the reviewer able to discern the vision of the production and the execution of that vision?