As later on more states started succeeding from the Union, where they formed the Confederacy. The simple answer is yes: the Civil War was completely inevitable, but there were many events, documents and people before its beginning that certainly had a large bearing on the war itself. Now with Lincoln being the president the south felt very uncomfortable since Lincoln wanted a preserve union and anti-slavery. Given the seriousness of slavery issues, as well as the consequences to which they led, the Civil War was inevitable. The American Revolution marked significant changes in the political, social, and economic status of the Americans. Dred Scott, who had lived in Illinois for 5 years with his master, sued his master for his freedom because Illinois was a free state.
As the North and the South became angry at each other and took different sides, one of the main conflicts was the election of The core argument of this essay centres around the evidence which clearly defines their being in existence two Was Victory For The North Inevitable?
The two most important causes are slavery and the expansion of the United States causing an unbalance of free and slave states. The most divisive political issue in the United States in the mids was the expansion of slavery, and slavery is certainly the common denominator of the events leading up to the Civil War. The conflict arose from a nation thats geographical areas had slowly grown apart in their ideals and also their source of income, which is often the cause of strife between battling regions. True, the Missouri Compromise made it possible to maintain the existing balance between slave and non-slave states, but it left the issue of slavery unresolved; and as a result, the civil war remained as possible and inevitable, as all further conflicts and disagreements associated with the need to abolish slavery in the United States.
This Civil War was first inspired by the unsettling differences that divided the northern and southern states over the power that resided in the hands of the national government to constrain slavery from taking place within the territories
To some extent, Daniel Webster might have been correct in that nullification as a political doctrine could not lead to anything beyond anarchy and civil war. For many years since the time of Alexander Hamilton, the United States economy had been ruled by a system of tariffs designed to protect the growing American industry from external influence. However, such admission would have broken the balance between slave and non-slave states: the eleven slave and the eleven non-slave states had equal number of senators and governmental representatives, with this equality being fragile but nevertheless a necessary precondition for temporary political reconciliation.