I was able to analyze a none existent image in my head and get myself thinking. Folks trust me. On to my last point but first, can we just appreciate that goat up there? So hilarious.
Heck you could get away with analyzing 4 or 5 simple ones if you wanted. Granted your analysis is spot on that is. Obviously most examples are off the top of my head but you get the idea. Remember to give yourself time to analyze. Your grade depends on it. Stylistic devices are a part of the structure of your writing because they are a major core aspect for your analysis. This makes it crucial to your overall answer. Where possible you should be picking out a stylistic device or two.
If you want to take a look at my Paper 2 advice then click here. If you are able to swap any two topic sentences, and it makes no difference to your commentary, then you have a list not an argument. Paragraphs Your paragraphs must be well-planned, and centre around the points you wish to make. Long paragraphs anything over three quarters of a page suggest a lack of planning, and increase the likelihood of drifting far from your topic sentence.
Similarly, watch the introduction of new material mid-paragraph, which also suggests a lack of planning. These events can be referred to as the plot. But this is only half of the whole story. The above list of three things would be very sufficient if you were just having a casual chat with your friends.
Your analysis must go deeper than the surface meaning. Criterion B: Interpretation of the Text 5 : Excellent interpretation of the text the candidates ideas are convincing and include an appropriate and considered personal response the analysis is consistently detailed and persuasively illustrated by carefully chosen examples. Criterion C : Appreciation of Literary Features 5 : Excellent appreciation of the literary features of the text detailed and persuasive appreciation of the effects of the literary features of the text the analysis is detailed and illustrated by carefully chosen examples.
Criterion 5 : A clearly focused, well-developed and persuasive argument purposeful and effective structure to the commentary supporting examples are well integrated into the body of the commentary. Criterion E: Formal Use of Language 5 : The language is clear, varied, precise and concise clear, varied, precise and concise use of language no significant lapses in grammar, spelling and sentence construction precise use of wide vocabulary and varied idiom and style effective choice of register.
How to fulfill the criteria. Criterion A There isn't a fixed way in which you can achieve this criteria. Why would the author target them? Is it stated obviously or can I assume it? What historical aspects does it refer to? How about the mood that this afflicts on the reader? What can I say there? What kind of devices are used to achieve this effect? What can I say regarding this point? English is all about interpretation. So long as you have a solid argument, you can interpret the texts in any which way you want.
Are your analyses in depth enough to convince the examiner?
If you are able to swap any two topic sentences, and it makes no difference to your commentary, then you have a list not an argument.
If I was rushing, I might squeeze both points into one paragraph. Does it tie in with the overall theme of the literary piece itself? This makes it crucial to your overall answer. Spelling, punctuation and grammar all equate to an easy 5 marks in a commentary, but do not forget that your register must also be appropriately formal and engaging. Whenever you can or you think a particular bit means something but you aren't sure , add the phrase "I think this means Perhaps the subtly of the image placement reflects how the theme is overlooked which is why the author is attempting to bring the theme to the attention of the reader?
Not that kind of date. You are making no argument. Style — What kind of style do they write with? Since these are pro strategies, you should come to terms with them because getting the hang of them may help you on your test. You need to discuss the characters, themes and plot of the chosen text. Criterion B: Interpretation of the Text 5 : Excellent interpretation of the text the candidates ideas are convincing and include an appropriate and considered personal response the analysis is consistently detailed and persuasively illustrated by carefully chosen examples.
What effect do the images have on the audience? If I was rushing, I might squeeze both points into one paragraph. Criterion E: Formal Use of Language 5 : The language is clear, varied, precise and concise clear, varied, precise and concise use of language no significant lapses in grammar, spelling and sentence construction precise use of wide vocabulary and varied idiom and style effective choice of register. A blue, yellow, red one?
The less you know, the more you analyze. This is especially important when constructing your thesis and thinking about the wider idea behind the text.
Richard Nixon. What would you talk about? Well, your task for the rest of the exam is to write a commentary on just one of the two texts. Remember when I told you to highlight and circle anything important? Folks trust me.
Equally, think about how images work together across stanzas when writing on a poem — the poems in Paper 1 are usually chosen because they develop in some way. Paper 2 you say? You realistically have about 15 about 10 or so for SL minutes by now. Many of these have been compiled from previous marking experience! Use the same logic to a picture as you would a text. Structure You have a choice between a linear and a thematic structure, but your choice must be dictated by the nature of the passage.