Compare State Constitution And Us Constitution Essay

Interpret 11.09.2019

Although they are two different governing compares, there are similarities and differences between the federal and state constitutions.

  • Counter argument essay examples concession and rebuttal
  • Templates for compare and contrast essays
  • College panda act essay pdf
  • Bacardi and the long fight for cuba gjelten essay
  • Multistate essay exam word limit

Both establish a form of government and provide compare for those branches of government to operate. Illustration The photo of delegates and friends at the state analysis and on free will convention,is from the Ludwig-Svenson collection, American Heritage Center, University of Wyoming. Used constitution permission and thanks. Contact us at editor wyohistory.

For more information about our sponsors and the people behind WyoHistory. As a result, why northwestern supplement essay has state been amended seventeen times since the adoption of the Bill of Rights in State constitutions are more open to amendments. Like the U.

Compare state constitution and us constitution essay

Bill of Rights, Hawaiians are specifically guaranteed constitution of religion, speech, assembly, and petition. For example, in article 1. All rights reserved.

CaliforniaConstitution Versus Federal Constitution - California Globe

For example, Hawaiians are protected and discrimination and are promised equal protection under the law. In article 1. Yet, a key essay between Hawaiian foundational documents and the U. Like the Declaration of Independence, but not directly stated in the U. Constitution, Hawaiians are guaranteed the constitution to life, constitution, and the pursuit of happiness.

Pay to write my paper

As applied to the United States, list and explain at least two shared political values that most people, regardless of race, creed, national origin, in the US share. Something that I believe everyone share regardless of race, National Origins and, creed is the Freedom of Liberty, the right to be free. As long as other people right aren 't abused. Another thing that everyone shared in the United States is Democracy. The state constitution includes additional protections that the federal constitution does not. Federal constitutional protections apply to the states by means of the Fourteenth Amendment. As such, California and its Constitution are prohibited from violating fundamental rights provided by the United States Constitution. In addition to the United States Constitution, each state has its own constitution and therefore, its own body of constitutional law as well. But there are various ways state constitutions differ from the federal Constitution. In the Australian constitution the Queen holds the executive power and also has legislative power. The Governor General is appointed by the Queen and is also the commander-in-chief. But this is precisely what the Texas Constitution was designed to reverse and avoid. The framers of the U. Constitution wanted to enable government action; the framers of the Texas Constitution wanted to paralyze government action. Length and Language Whereas the U. Instead, public officials must amend the constitution if they wish to act outside of the detailed language set forth in the basic law. The location of language in each document is also revealing. Whereas specific civil liberties in the U. Constitution are mostly listed in amendments known as the Bill of Rights, a Bill of Rights forms the very first article of the Texas Constitution. Write a brief essay that addresses the questions: How are these portions of the U. How are they different? Use examples from the texts to defend or explain your answer. This site provides a view of the original document and its amendments. This online exhibit explores the process that Wyoming went through as a territory to gain congressional recognition as a state.

As noted in the previous paragraph, equal rights between the sexes are also guaranteed. This is not mentioned in the U.

Constitution after the Equal Rights Amendment failed to gain approval from the and 38 states in the s. History, n.

Compare state constitution and us constitution essay

Segregation is specifically outlawed in the Hawaiian constitution as is imprisonment for debt. The Governor General is appointed by the Queen and is also the commander-in-chief. The U.

Comparing the United States Constitution with Local State | Bartleby

Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power. But this is precisely what the Texas Constitution was designed to constitution and avoid.

The framers of the U.

Use examples from the texts to defend or explain your answer. This site provides a view of the original document and its amendments. This online exhibit explores the process that Wyoming went through as a territory to gain congressional recognition as a state. The addition of these two documents alone demonstrates the unique character of this living document, quite different from that of the United States Constitution. The story of the events leading up to the Wyoming Constitutional Convention in September of is told on pp. Following sections also include copies of documents from the congressional record that were filed for the purpose of receiving authorization for Wyoming to become a state. Illustration The photo of delegates and friends at the state constitutional convention, , is from the Ludwig-Svenson collection, American Heritage Center, University of Wyoming. All rights reserved. For example, Hawaiians are protected against discrimination and are promised equal protection under the law. In article 1. Yet, a key difference between Hawaiian foundational documents and the U. Like the Declaration of Independence, but not directly stated in the U. Constitution, Hawaiians are guaranteed the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. As noted in the previous paragraph, equal rights between the sexes are also guaranteed. This is not mentioned in the U. Constitution after the Equal Rights Amendment failed to gain approval from the necessary 38 states in the s. History, n. Segregation is specifically outlawed in the Hawaiian constitution as is imprisonment for debt. All-inall, the Hawaiian constitution goes into greater detail in terms of the rights afforded to its citizens Hawaii State Constitution, article I. Another difference between the U. S foundational and Hawaiian foundational documents is the right to privacy, which is implied within the U. This right is important since it protects people against unnecessary interference from the government as long as they are following the law and not harming others. The legislature shall take affirmative steps to implement this right Hawaii State Constitution, article I, section 6. Constitutional principles as determined necessary for their individual populations. Since the United States encompasses such a large amount of territory, certain states should be free to list out certain rights. Hawaii strikes a good middle ground in terms of privacy and general versus specific language. While it is mentioned as a right, the Hawaiian constitution does not get into excessive detail about what privacy rights entail. This is left to the court system. Constitution, but also remains malleable to adapt and serve its citizens. Constitution, amendment I. Federal constitutional protections apply to the states by means of the Fourteenth Amendment. As such, California and its Constitution are prohibited from violating fundamental rights provided by the United States Constitution. While the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land, the California Constitution sets forth the duties, powers, structure, and functions of the state government. Again both the US constitution and the Aust. Constitution have segments dedicated to state powers and alteration; however the Aust. The constitution of Georgia has even been replaced altogether as many as ten times. This entry was posted in Uncategorized by admin. Bookmark the permalink.

Constitution wanted to enable government action; the framers of the Texas Constitution wanted to paralyze government action. Length and Language Whereas the U.

Constitution Comparison Essay - Words | Cram

Through examining the Federalist essays and comparing their ideology with the Constitution state of it, it is clear that the Constitution created and safeguarded the rights of citizens while maintaining an informal compare system.

great recession essay topics In John North's article "Politics and Aristocracy in the Roman Republic" he contends that Polybius's constitution was democratic, while in reality it did not operate as such.

Hamm And and Hamm begin their constitutions with introducing the personal leadership development plan essay to the historical lineage of American legislatures and their evolution from colonial days to the modern government. In the article, the colonists had also come up with an idea of the constitution ordinance to create new states and cover the national debt.

At the federal level, however, the U. Supreme Court has ruled the line-item veto unconstitutional, arguing that it violates the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The fact that the Texas Constitution provides for a line-item veto demonstrates an affinity for limited government and limited spending, even if it comes at a cost of granting power to the governor in a way the rest of the constitution is designed to avoid. The Legislative Branch Legislatively, there is very little in the U. Constitution that limits the tax and spending policies which U. Representatives and Senators may write into law. In Texas, however, detailed restrictions on tax and spending policies significantly restrict what state legislators are actually allowed to write into law. For example, legislators are constitutionally forbidden from implementing a tax on personal income or allowing the state government to go into debt, and the constitution mandates that specific percentages of the state budget be spent on specific policy areas, most notably for public schools and universities as stipulated in Article 7. Furthermore, the U. Congress is a full-time, professional legislature that meets annually; members of Congress make their living as elected officials. But the Texas legislature is a part-time, non-professional legislature that meets every two years for day sessions. The Judicial Branch Judicially, the contrasts between federal government and state government could not be starker. The federal judiciary is simple and orderly, with three levels of courts — district courts, appeals courts, and the U. Supreme Court, the final word on all statutory and constitutional matters. All federal judges are appointed, not elected, and Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, with the specific intent of removing the judiciary from the pressures of electoral politics, allowing protection of minority interests in a government system designed to allow majority rule. In contrast, the Texas judiciary is complicated and confusing. The Texas Constitution establishes six types of courts, some of which have concurrent or overlapping jurisdictions. Plus, in the tradition of Jacksonian Democracy, all Texas judges must contend with electoral politics and win their positions in partisan elections. Amendment Process A final difference of note between the U. Constitution has only been amended 27 times and 10 of those amendments the Bill of Rights were part of the founding document. In contrast, the Texas Constitution is relatively easy to amend. While it is somewhat difficult to get a constitutional amendment proposed it requires a two-thirds majority in both houses of the legislature , once a proposal is approved by the legislature, it passes relatively simply. The governor cannot veto a proposal to amend the constitution and the proposal is implemented if approved by a simple majority of the popular vote. Because constitutional amendments are often needed to change overly-detailed public policies, amendments are frequent, with the total number of amendments to the Texas Constitution now approaching Amending the Texas Constitution The Texas Constitution has been amended numerous times over its long history. While some amendments have been trivial, many others have produced major changes to the document. Their differences are as abundant as their similarities. The Australian constitution is extremely long and drawn out, where as the United States constitution sticks right to the point. All in all, the two constitutions have the same goal in that they wish to bestow the same basic rights to each person. Again both the US constitution and the Aust. Constitution have segments dedicated to state powers and alteration; however the Aust. The Australian constitution has a parliamentary system, which is not bicameral, although their system has a house of representatives and a senate; these two houses have to share power with the Queen. The Prime Minister leads the legislature.

Its main weakness was its failure to allocate powers to the federal government; hence it was considered to be insufficient. The federal government in the articles of confederation had no ability to regulate commerce and taxes.

State Constitutions vs. The United States Constitution Posted on January 6, The United States Constitution defines the structure of the constitution government and dictates the compare and and of its powers. The application of the articles and amendments of the Constitution comprise state law. In addition to the United States Constitution, each constitution has its own essay and therefore, its own body of constitutional law as well. But there are various ways state constitutions differ from the federal Constitution. Often, state constitutions are much longer compare and contrast essay examles more detailed than the federal Constitution.