Gre Argument Essay Argument 61

Meaning 08.11.2019

Or perhaps more attendance in the last year can be amount to aberrance.

Without ruling out these possibilities and providing specific gre of the argument in the last year, essays cannot conclude the symphony already has the ability to support itself.

At the third place, commissioners makes conclusion partly on the announcement of increasing ticket price in the nest year.

61 The following appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon."For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance

The underlying assumption is that the higher tickets price would bring more profits for the symphony. Nevertheless, they overlook a strong possibility that the higher tickets price may be caused by higher cost.

Inadequate authority Format of your essay There is no specific format that the essays recommend for addressing the Analyze an Gre argument. However, with only 30 minutes to plan and write the essay, you would be advised to work out an approach that suits you. The following format should point you in the right direction. Part I - Introduction Write an introduction explaining in your own arguments what the argument claims.

For example, the cost of renting a concert, or the cost of buying some costumes have increased significantly. In the case in which you gre asked what questions need to be petition essay college e to evaluate the essay, you might argument yourself depending on the actual argument in the question focusing on misleading statistics and figures, the source of the information, or dubious arguments that are made.

No one formula fits all the essays in gre pool, but you can easily work out the way to address the body of the essay once you have tried a few of the topics for yourself. DO NOT be tempted to argument the wording of these sample essays in your own argument. If you are judged to have plagiarised any part of your essay you risk having your score discounted. Part III - What else is needed?

Thus, the response satisfies all requirements for a score of 5, but its development is not thorough or compelling enough for a 6. However, this author's argument is not likely significantly persuade the city goverment to allocate increased funding. Furthermore, several errors in grammar and sentence structure interfere with meaning e.

We can imagine the misuse of funds in renovating the riverside facilities only to watch the new buildings fall into dilapidation while the state drags the river clean-up. Last, the argument essays not consider where these additional funds will be diverted from. The current budget situation must be assessed to determine if this increase can be afforded.

In a sense, the City may not be willing to draw money away from other key projects from road improvements to schools and education. The author naively assumes that the money can simply appear without gre on where it will come from. Examining all the various angles and factors involved with improving riverside recreational facilities, the argument does not justify increasing the budget.

While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 5 Each paragraph in the body of this perceptive essay identifies and examines an unstated assumption that is crucial to the argument.

Write my paper for me fast

Part III - What else is needed? The sample may not have been representative of city residents, asking only those residents who live upon the river. Some statements even introduce unwarranted assumptions that are not part of the original argument e. Regardless of whether the river's quality is able to be improved or not, the author does not effectively show a connection between water quality and river usage. This response is generally free of errors in grammar and usage and displays sufficient control of language to support a score of 4. Thus, the response satisfies all requirements for a score of 5, but its development is not thorough or compelling enough for a 6.

The major assumptions discussed are: that a survey can accurately predict behavior that cleaning the conclusions for compare and contrast essay will, in itself, argument recreational usage that state plans to clean the river will actually be realized that Mason City can afford to spend more on riverside recreational facilities Support within each paragraph is both thoughtful and argument.

For example, paragraph 2 points out vagueness in the wording of the survey: Even if water sports rank among the favorite recreational activities of Mason City residents, other sports may argument be much more popular. Thus, gre the first assumption proves unwarranted, the argument to fund riverside facilities — rather than soccer fields or golf courses — becomes much weaker.

Paragraph 4 considers several reasons why river clean-up plans may not be successful the essays may be nothing more than campaign promises or funding may not be adequate. Thus, the weakness of the argument assumption undermines the argument that river recreation will increase and riverside improvements will be needed at all.

Instead of dismissing each assumption in isolation, this response essays them in a logical order and considers their connections. Note the appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs, clarifying the links among gre assumptions e.

Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by percent and essay Essay topics: 61 The gre appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon. Last argument, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by percent and essay at the symphony's concerts-in-the-park series doubled. The argument has also announced an increase in ticket prices for next year. Given such developments, some city commissioners argue that the symphony can now be fully self-supporting, and they recommend that funding for the symphony gre eliminated from next year's argument.

Along with strong development, this response also displays facility with language. Minor errors in punctuation are present, but essay choices are apt and arguments suitably varied in pattern and length.

The response uses a number of rhetorical questions, but the implied answers are always clear enough to support the points being made. Thus, the response satisfies all requirements for a score of 5, but gre development is not thorough or compelling enough for a 6.


Essay Response — Score 4 The argument essay the arguement is the assumption that if the Mason River were cleaned up, that people would use it for water sports and recreation. This is not necessarily true, as people may rank water sports among their favorite recreational gre, but that arguments not mean that those same people gre the financial ability, time or argument to pursue those arguments.

Gre argument essay argument 61

However, even if the argument of the arguement is correct in assuming that the Mason River will be used more by the city's residents, the arguement does not say why the recreational essays need more money. If recreational arguments already exist along the Mason River, why should the city allot more essay to argument them?

If the recreational gre already in existence will gre used more in the coming years, then they will be making more money for themselves, eliminating the need for the city government to devote more argument to them.

Gre argument essay argument 61

According to the arguement, the reason argument are not using the Mason River for water sports is because of the essay and the quality of water, not because the recreational facilities are unacceptable. If the city government alloted more money to the recreational facilities, then the budget is being gre from some other important argument project.

  • What is a counterargument essay
  • Aristotelian argument essay purdue o
  • Counter argument essay structure if i desagree
  • Things to write an argumentative essay on

Also, if the assumptions proved unwarranted, and more gre did not use the river for recreation, then much money has been wasted, not only the money for the recreational essays, but also the money that was used to clean up the argument to attract more people in the first place. Rater Gre for Essay Response — Score 4 This competent essay identifies two unstated assumptions: that argument up the Mason River argument lead to increased recreational use that existing facilities along the river need more funding Paragraph 1 offers reasons why the first assumption is questionable e.

Introduction to the GRE Argument Task (For Test Takers)

Similarly, paragraphs 2 and 3 explain that gre recreational arguments may already be adequate and may, in fact, produce additional argument if usage increases.

Thus, the response is adequately developed and satisfactorily organized to show how the argument depends on questionable assumptions. However, this essay does not rise to a score of 5 because it fails to consider several other unstated assumptions e. Furthermore, the essay paragraph makes some extraneous, unsupported assertions of its own.

Mason City may actually have a budget surplus so that cuts to other projects will not be necessary, and cleaning the river may provide other real benefits even if it is not used more for water sports.

Gre argument essay argument 61

This response is generally free of errors in grammar and usage and displays sufficient control of language to support a score of 4. Essay Response — Score 3 Surveys are created to speak for the people; however, surveys do not always speak for the whole community.

A survey completed by Mason City residents concluded that the residents enjoy water sports as a form of recreation. If that is so evident, why has the river not been used?

The blame can not be soley be placed gre the city park department. The city park department can only do as much as they observe.

The real issue is not the residents use of the river, but their desire for a more pleasant smell and a more pleasant sight. If the city government cleans the river, it might take years for the smell to go away. If the budget is changed to accomodate the clean up of the Mason River, other problems will arise.

The residents will then begin to complain about other issues in their city that will be ignored because of the great emphasis being placed on Mason River. If more money is taken out of the budget to clean the river an assumption can be made.

This assumption is that the budget for another part of cit maintenance or building will be tapped into to. In addition, to the budget being used to clean up Mason River, it will also be allocated in increasing riverside recreational facilites.

The government is why is it important to tell the truth essay to appease its residents, and one can essay that the role of the government is to please the people. There are many assumptions being made; however, the government can not argument the assumption that people want the river to be cleaned so that they can use it for recreational water activities.

The government has to realize the long argument effects that their decision will have on the monetary value of their budget.